A maximum of 41 participants (29%) regarded the fresh new affordances of your app to explain as to why it ghosted other people. Particular referred to the ease off ghosting (letter = 32). It described it are much easier than in person rejecting another individual because of the anonymity provided by the newest software in addition to fact that there can be no common social network. Other people http://www.datingranking.net/de/flirtwith-review mentioned they removed the fresh new application meaning that deleted each of their talks and you may associations (n = 9). Eventually, particular participants plus said that the brand new overburden out of possible people provided from the relationship app’s access to an enormous relationship pool added these to ghost anybody else these people were smaller wanting (n = 5).

No responsibility to communicate (n = 31; 22%)

A more impressive band of participants (letter = 29) stated they don’t are obligated to pay one another one thing which ghosting is part of mobile relationships software play with, that is regarding the thought of mobile relationships ideologies just like the earlier explained. Just like the Melanie (twenty-seven, heterosexual) explains: “I really don’t owe each other an explanation while the I don’t see this individual deal with-to-deal with.” At the same time, a couple participants struggled to the fact that their reasons for rejecting each other were not obvious. They for this reason featured easier for them to ghost as opposed to so you’re able to explore a direct break up approach since this would need supplying the other individual a description.

Question on the other

Personally rejecting anyone else is not simple and particular ghosters (n = 23; 16%) failed to need to damage the other person by the vocally rejecting him or her. As a whole, 21 participants observed it becoming far more boring to spell it out so you can the other person as to the reasons it denied her or him (elizabeth.grams., not glamorous/interesting enough) rather than to simply ghost the other person. Additionally, around three respondents mentioned it ghosted while they did not need certainly to hack the other person by top her or him to the and you can faking appeal.

To complement the qualitative findings on why respondents ghost, we conducted a logistic regression (see Table 1) to examine H1 and to explore which demographic and situational variables explain who ghosts. The overall model was significant, ? 2 (7) = , p < 0.001, Cox and Snell R 2 = .17, and Nagelkerke R 2 = .23 and the model fit was good, Hosmer and Lemeshow test, ? 2 (8) = 6.57, p = .584. As expected, dating app frequency in the past 31 days was a significant predictor of ghosting others (B = ?.26*). However, contrarily to our expectations for H1, the frequency of dating app use decreased the likelihood of ghosting others: For every step decrease in dating app use, the odds to ghost increased with 1.30. Interestingly, gender was not a significant predictor of having ghosted, which means that the odds for women to ghost other dating app users are not significantly higher than the odds for men. Contrarily, age was a significant predictor of having ghosted others on dating apps. For every year decrease in age, the odds to ghost increased with 1.08. Participants' perceptions of others' ghosting experiences (both in terms of ghosting others and being ghosted by others) were not significantly associated with the likelihood to ghost. Similarly, having been ghosted by other dating app users was not significantly associated with the likelihood to ghost others, yet this could be because only 18 respondents were in the category that never experienced ghosting compared to 153 respondents in the category that had been ghosted.

When viewing this new emotional answers participants must ghosting, more participants (n = 86) stated effect unfortunate or hurt following the ghosting sense. Almost every other commonly said attitude was impact enraged (letter = 65) and impression disappointed or disillusioned (n = 48). Aforementioned can be illustrated from the Lennert’s (twenty-five, homosexual) experience: “I desired to think for the online dating so terribly, but I’m starting to question they more than once. I believe some one need a whole lot more knowledge regarding it, it ruins our very own people relationships and helps to create hidden agendas.” Because not absolutely all respondents instantly realized they’d come ghosted, many of them also said they certainly were worried as they presumed something crappy got occurred towards ghoster (n = 16). 7 participants experienced ashamed that they had been ghosted, whereas five felt alleviated which they was ghosted because is actually a clear indication each other was not a great fit. In the long run, twenty-eight participants explicitly mentioned that they had little to no emotional reaction for the ghosting experience.